Précis: The Federal Court ordered the defendant to pay damages arising from a collision between their moving container ship and a stationary scow.
Full SummaryLever v. Mehr and Qaderi
Précis: The Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded judgment for damages arising from negligent operation of two jet skis rented from the plaintiff.
Turcotte v. Dufour, 2015 QCCA 1914
Précis: Where two vessels were proceeding on parallel courses at speed and one vessel suddenly veers sharply putting itself in front of the other, the turning vessel is 100% liable for the resulting collision.
Full SummaryR v. Reinbrecht, 2015 BCSC 1960
Précis: The accused was found guilty of criminal negligence
Full SummaryPeracomo Inc. v. Telus Communications, 2012 FCA 199, 2014 SCC 29
PrĂ©cis: The Supreme Court of Canada overturned a decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in which a vessel operator was held to be disentitled to the benefit of limitation of liability. The Supreme Court of Canada held that limitation of liability was available to the operator who had intentionally cut a submarine cable. However, the operator’s conduct did constitute “wilful misconduct” within the meaning of the Marine Insurance Act and, as a consequence, the loss was excluded from the insurance coverage.
Full SummaryWestshore Terminals Limited v. Leo Ocean S.A. (The Cape Apricot), 2014 FC 132
PrĂ©cis: The Federal Court held that a pilot whose certificate of competency issued under the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 had expired was nevertheless a “licensed pilot” within the meaning of the Pilotage Act with the result that the pilot was entitled to limit his liability and the ship owner was liable for his negligence.
Full SummaryGrieg Shipping A/S v. Fortune Marine Ltd. (The Dubai Fortune), 2012 FC 1110, 2013 FCA 218
Précis: The Federal Court of Appeal confirmed the trial judgment that, in the circumstances, the vessel was not vicariously liable for the negligent acts of the master of the tug.
Full SummaryHogan v. Buote, 2012 PESC 10
Précis: Liability for a collision was apportioned 75% to the give way vessel and 25% to the other vessel.
Full SummaryBuckley v. Buhlman, 2012 FCA 9
PrĂ©cis: The Federal Court of Appeal upheld a decision of the Federal Court wherein it was determined that the limits of liability under the MLA applicable to “passengers” apply only to persons on board the ship seeking to limit liability.
Full SummaryWolverine Motor Works Shipyard LLC v. Canadian Naval Memorial Trust, 2011 NSSC 308
In this case the defendant’s steel hulled vessel broke loose from its moorings and struck and sank the plaintiff’s sail boat which was moored alongside. The incident occurred as Hurricane Juan was pounding the Nova Scotia coast. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was negligent. The court, however, found that the defendant was aware of the approaching hurricane and prepared for …
Full Summary