Vukorep v. Bartulin, 2005 BCCA 142

In Limitation of Liability in Maritime Law on (Updated )

In July 1998 the Plaintiff was injured on board the Defendant’s pleasure craft when the vessel hit a wave from a passing ferry. At the time of the accident the vessel was being operated by the Defendant who was also the owner. The Defendant brought this application for a determination of whether he could limit his liability pursuant to s. …

Full Summary

Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. The "Sheena M", [2000] F.C.J. No. 1953

In Limitation of Liability in Maritime Law on (Updated )

This action arose out of the collision between the unmanned barge, "Rivtow 901", in tow of the "Sheena M", and the Mission Railway Bridge. The Plaintiffs, the owners of the "Sheena M", brought this application for summary judgment for an order that they were entitled to limit their liability under s. 577(1)(b) of the Canada Shipping Act to $500,000.00 plus …

Full Summary

Cox v. Brown, 1996 CanLII 1463

In Limitation of Liability in Maritime Law on (Updated )

This was a summary trial for a declaration that the Defendant was entitled to limit her liability under the Canada Shipping Act. The facts were that a small motor boat operated by the Defendant struck a swimmer in Okanagan Lake. At the time, the Defendant was operating the boat without the permission of the owner, the Defendant’s father. (An action …

Full Summary

Daniele v. Creglia, No. 4028-93, (Ont. Ct. Gen. Div.)

In Limitation of Liability in Maritime Law on (Updated )

This was an action by a Plaintiff/passenger against an owner/master for damages for personal injury suffered when a small vessel crashed into a breakwater. The Court held that the owner/master was clearly negligent in travelling at an excessive rate of speed and in not maintaining a proper lookout. The only real issue was whether the owner could limit his liability …

Full Summary

Valley Towing Ltd. v. Celtic Shipyards (1988) Ltd., [1995] 3 FC 527

In Limitation of Liability in Maritime Law on (Updated )

In this matter a barge under tow of the Plaintiff’s tug collided with and caused extensive damage to various docks and vessels. The Plaintiff tug owner admitted liability and commenced limitation proceedings. The Plaintiff then brought a motion for a stay of all proceedings upon payment of the limitation fund ($42,000) into Court. The Court allowed the Plaintiff’s motion but …

Full Summary