This case involved an appeal from an order of the trial division of the Federal Court (2000 F.C.J. 1885) allowing an appeal from an order of a Prothonotary (reported at (1999) 175 F.T.R. 182). The alleged facts, as taken from several of the judgements, are quite complicated as the case arose out of what is commonly called a “licence swap” …
Full SummaryCassie v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries and Oceans), 2001 FCT 379
This case involved an application by a group of snow crab fishermen for an injunction ordering the Minister of Fisheries to issue snow crab licences to them. Whether or not the court could issue an order of mandamus compelling the Minister to issue the requested licences. In denying the application, the court relied upon Hahlon v. Canada (Minister of Employment …
Full SummaryYale First Nation v. HMTQ In Right of Canada et al, 2001 BCSC 746
Yale First Nation v. HMTQ In Right of Canada et al 2001 BCSC 746 This case involved an alleged agreement between the Yale First Nation and the Minister of Fisheries to allow a pilot sale fishery in the year 2000 pursuant to the Aboriginal Communal Fishing Licence Regulations. In an application for summary judgment under Rule 18A, the Yale First …
Full SummaryAucoin v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries and Oceans), 2001 FCT 800
This case involved a challenge to a co-management agreement between D.F.O. andthe East Coast (zone 12) snow crab fishermen. It is reported that as a result of changes to the Unemployment Insurance Act in 1995, it became apparent that numerous employees working in snow crab processing plants were not going to be able to work the minimum number of weeks …
Full SummaryDurant v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries and Oceans), 2002 FCT 327
This case involved an application for judicial review of a decision by the Minister of Fisheries to discontinue the practise of allowing oyster cleaners to go out onboard oyster boats to clean oysters while the boats fish. Although a fisher’s registration card and a licence were apparently required to clean oysters aboard a fish boat, for many years D.F.O had …
Full SummaryNewell v. Canada, 2002 FCT 373
This case involved a crab fisherman who exceeded his individual quota for 1999 crab landings and consequently had his 2000 individual quota reduced by an amount equal approximately to his overage in the previous year. In response, the fisherman commenced an action against the Crown seeking damages for the Crown’s “intentional tortuous interference with his economic interests which caused him …
Full SummaryTucker v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries and Oceans), 2001 FCA 384
This case involved an action by a fisherman against the Minister of Fisheries for damages arising from a decision by the Minister requiring the fisherman to elect either to utilize an inshore fishing licence for groundfish or an offshore fishing licence for turbot. In reviewing the Minister’s discretionary power to issue licences under section 7 of the Fisheries Act, the …
Full SummaryJose Pereira E. Hijos, S.A. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2001 FCT 1434
This case involved a damage action against the Federal Government alleging trespass, assault and negligent navigation arising out of the seizure of the Spanish fishing vessel “Estai” on the high seas in 1995. The decision involved a pre-trial application for an order that a Crown official answer a number questions with respect allegations that the Canadian Government was involved in …
Full SummaryJada Fishing Co. Ltd. et al v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries and Oceans), 2002 FCA 103
In this case the motions judge (Pelletier J.), reviewed a recommendation regarding a quota allocation adjustment for an individual fisherman made by the Pacific Region Licence Appeal Board to the Minister of Fisheries. Using the Pushpanathan pragmatic and functional analysis as applied to an “expert tribunal,” the motions judge applied a standard of review of reasonableness. Upon appeal, the Federal …
Full SummaryHache v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries and Oceans), 2002 FCT 703
This case is the sequel to Aucoin v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries and Oceans) [2001] F.C.J. 1157 (digested herein). Aucoin involved a challenge to a co-management agreement between D.F.O. and the East Coast (zone 12) snow crab fishermen. It is reported that as a result of changes to the Unemployment Insurance Act in 1995, it became apparent that numerous employees …
Full Summary