PrĂ©cis: The court held that service of a statement of claim on a freight forwarder, who sometimes acted as agent for the defendant and who was identified as an agent on the defendant’s website, was valid service.
Full SummaryPrĂ©cis: The court held that service of a statement of claim on a freight forwarder, who sometimes acted as agent for the defendant and who was identified as an agent on the defendant’s website, was valid service.
Full Summary