Cami Automotive, Inc v. Westwood Shipping Lines Inc, 2009 FC 664, 2012 FCA 16

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

Précis: The Federal Court of Appeal upheld a decision of the Federal Court holding that a rail carrier could choose the limitation that was the most beneficial to it.

Full Summary

Les Courtiers Breen Ltee. v. Mediterranean Shipping Co., 2010 QCCQ 583, 2011 QCCA 2173

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

The main issue in this case was the liability of the carrier for damage to a cargo of clementines carried from South Africa to Montreal via New York. The container in which the cargo was stowed had been stowed and sealed by the shipper and the carrier argued that the plaintiff had not proven the goods were received by it …

Full Summary

Gearbulk Pool Ltd. v. Seaboard Shipping Co., 2006 BCCA 552

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

This matter involved a claim for indemnity by the Plaintiff ocean carrier against the Defendant for damages the Plaintiff was ordered to pay in the matter of Timberwest Forest Ltd. v Gearbulk Pool Ltd. et al., 2003 BCCA 39 (the “underlying action”). In the underlying action the cargo of lumber was comprised of two consignments destined to two different consignees. …

Full Summary

Shtutman v. Ocean Marine Shipping Inc., 2005 FC 1471

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

The Plaintiff alleged that the carrier was liable for the loss of the contents of a container carried by sea from Halifax to Conakry. Specifically, the Plaintiff alleged that the carrier had either mis-delivered the container or that the contents of the container had been stolen while the container was in the possession of the carrier. Unfortunately, the Plaintiff’s case …

Full Summary

Timberwest Forest Ltd. v. Gearbulk Pool Ltd. et al., 2003 BCCA 39

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

This case concerned the meaning of “goods” as defined in the Hague-Visby Rules and deals with the need for clarity and accuracy in descriptions of deck cargo. The Plaintiffs were the shippers and consignees of 1725 packages of lumber carried from Vancouver to Antwerp. The cargo was comprised of two consignments destined to two different consignees and covered by two …

Full Summary

Nova Steel Ltd. et al. v. The "Kapitonas Gudin", 2002 FCT 100

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

These cases were for damage to rolled coils carried from Latvia to Montreal. The coils were “pitted”, allegedly by sea water. The Defendants denied liability arguing the damage was caused by the excepted perils of peril of the sea (condensation), act or omission of the shipper (defective packaging) or inherent defect (mill defects in the coils). After reviewing the evidence, …

Full Summary

Mediterranean Shipping company S.A. v. Sipco Inc., 2001 FCT 1046

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

The Plaintiff in this action claimed against the Defendant for ocean freight owing in respect of the carriage by sea of nine containers from Toronto to the Persian Gulf. The Defendant admitted non-payment of freight but alleged that it was entitled to a set-off and brought a counterclaim alleging breaches of the contract by the Plaintiff. Specifically, the Defendant alleged …

Full Summary