Z.I. Pompey Industrie v. ECU-Line N.V., 2003 SCC 27

In Arbitration/Jurisdiction Clauses in Maritime Law on (Updated )

The Plaintiffs claimed that cargo carried from Belgium to Canada and then on to the US was damaged. The Appellant shipowner sought to rely on an exclusive jurisdiction clause in the bill of lading referring claims to the Courts of Belgium. The matter arose before s.46(1) of the Marine Liability Act came into force. The Prothonotary refused to uphold the …

Full Summary

Nestle Canada Inc. v. The "Viljandi" et al., 2003 FCT 28

In Arbitration/Jurisdiction Clauses in Maritime Law on (Updated )

This was an an application for a stay of proceedings on the basis of a jurisdiction clause contained in a bill of lading. The Court refused the stay on the grounds that the action had been commenced after the Marine Liability Act was proclaimed in force (August 8, 2001) and, therefore, the matter was covered by s. 46(1) of the …

Full Summary

Can-Am Produce and Trading Ltd. v. The "Senator", No. T-2353-95 (F.C.T.D.)

In Arbitration/Jurisdiction Clauses in Maritime Law on (Updated )

This matter concerned a motion by the Defendant to stay proceedings by reason of a jurisdiction clause in the bill of lading. The Plaintiff opposed the motion on three grounds: that there were two jurisdiction clauses in the bill of lading which were inconsistent; that Canada was the more convenient jurisdiction; and that the action was also against Canadian stevedores …

Full Summary

Trans-Continental Textile Recycling v. The "Erato II" and "MSC Giovanna", 1995 CanLII 3547 (FC)

In Arbitration/Jurisdiction Clauses in Maritime Law on (Updated )

In this matter the Defendant sought to rely on a jurisdiction clause in a bill of lading that selected New York as the proper forum. The Plaintiff opposed the Defendant’s motion for a stay on the grounds, inter alia, that the Defendant had attorned to the jurisdiction of the Federal Court. The Defendant had filed a Statement of Defence in …

Full Summary