Giroux v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FC 683

In Fish Cases, Judicial Review/Crown Liability on (Updated )

This case involved a challenge by group of commercial scallop fishers from one area when the Minister of Fisheries issued licenses to another group that allowed the other group to fish in the first groups historical area. This application was denied on the grounds that the Minister had very broad discretion to manage fisheries and issue licenses in doing so. …

Full Summary

Doucette v. Her Majesty the Queen (Minister of Fisheries), 2015 FC 734

In Fish Cases, Judicial Review/Crown Liability on (Updated )

In this case, the Applicant was a commercial fish harvester residing in Prince Edward Island who wished to move to New Brunswick. In order to do so, he sold the fishing license that he used while living in Prince Edward Island. After consulting with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans ("DFO"), he moved to New Brunswick and entered into an …

Full Summary

Morton v. Minister of Fisheries and Oceans and Marine Harvest Canada Inc., 2015 FC 575

In Fish Cases, Judicial Review/Crown Liability on (Updated )

This case involved judicial review of conditions in Salmon Farm licences on the Pacific Coast that allowed the transfer of diseased smolts from hatcheries to fish farms if, amongst other things, the fish farm’s veterinarian deems the transfer to be of low risk. After a lengthy analysis, the court granted an order declaring that the impugned licence conditions were of …

Full Summary

Malonie v. Shubenacadie Indian Band, 2014 FC 129

In Aboriginal Rights/Defences, Fish Cases, Judicial Review/Crown Liability on (Updated )

The applicant band member obtained a bank loan to purchase a fish boat upon the assurance of her Band Council that she would be given use of a communal snow crab licence and quota for a period of six years. She purchased the fish boat and had use of the licence and quota for three years. The Band then assigned …

Full Summary

Ahousaht Indian Band v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries and Oceans), 2014 FC 197

In Aboriginal Rights/Defences, Fish Cases, Fisheries Practice, Judicial Review/Crown Liability on (Updated )

In this case the applicants were a group of five First Nations located on the West Coast of Vancouver Island who had recently had their right to to fish and sell fish affirmed by the Supreme Court of B.C. with the issue of justification and infringement to be later determined. When affirming this right, the court had given the parties …

Full Summary

Malcolm v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries), 2014 FCA 130

In Fish Cases, Judicial Review/Crown Liability on (Updated )

This case involved a representative proceeding brought by the applicant on behalf of all commercial halibut licence holders in British Columbia. The applicant sought judicial review of a decision of the Minister of Fisheries changing the allocation of the total allowable catch (“TAC”) of halibut between the commercial sector and the recreational sector from 88% (commercial)/12% (recreational) to 85%/15%. In …

Full Summary

K'omok First Nation v. Canada (A.G.), 2012 FC 1160

In Aboriginal Rights/Defences, Fish Cases, Judicial Review/Crown Liability on (Updated )

This cased involved a challenge by the K’omoks First Nation (“FN”) with respect to the granting of four aqua-culture licences issued to non-members of the FN in its claimed traditional territory in 2010 shortly after the Federal Government took over jurisdiction for regulating aqua-culture following the Morton decision. It also involved a challenge to the Minister of renewal of these …

Full Summary

Kwicksutaineuk Ah-kw A-mish First Nation v. Canada (A.G.) et al., 2012 FC 517

In Aboriginal Rights/Defences, Fish Cases, Judicial Review/Crown Liability on (Updated )

This was an application for judicial review that was a direct consequence of the Morton decision that held the provincial regulatory regime over fin fish aquaculture was constitutionally invalid. As a result of this decision, the federal government was given one year to consider and put into place a regulatory regime over aquaculture in B.C. This meant approximately 680 provincial …

Full Summary

R v. Armstrong, 2012 BCCA 242

In Aboriginal Rights/Defences, Fish Cases, Judicial Review/Crown Liability, Miscellaneous, Offences on (Updated )

Full Summary