Cami Automotive, Inc v. Westwood Shipping Lines Inc, 2009 FC 664, 2012 FCA 16

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

Précis: The Federal Court of Appeal upheld a decision of the Federal Court holding that a rail carrier could choose the limitation that was the most beneficial to it.

Full Summary

Orient Overseas Container Line Limited v. Sogelco International, 2011 FC 1466

In Carriage of Goods by Sea, Judgments and Enforcement of Judgments on (Updated )

This was an appeal from a decision of a Prothonotary granting recognition and enforcement of a New York arbitration award. The appellant argued that the Prothonotary had erred in finding that there was a written arbitration agreement, a requirement of recognition and enforcement. The Appeal Judge, however, agreed with the Prothonotary. He found the undisputed evidence was that a services …

Full Summary

Les Courtiers Breen Ltee. v. Mediterranean Shipping Co., 2010 QCCQ 583, 2011 QCCA 2173

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

The main issue in this case was the liability of the carrier for damage to a cargo of clementines carried from South Africa to Montreal via New York. The container in which the cargo was stowed had been stowed and sealed by the shipper and the carrier argued that the plaintiff had not proven the goods were received by it …

Full Summary

Kuehne & Nagel Ltd. v. Agrimax Ltd., 2010 FC 1303

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

This was an action by a freight forwarder for payment of freight. The forwarder also had the “pen” of the NVOCC and was authorized to issue bills of lading on its behalf. The defendant argued that it was not liable for the freight because the forwarder refused to issue bills of lading with a date of loading different than the …

Full Summary

American Transport Logistics v. Kobi Group Inc., 2009 CanLii 65798

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

This was a motion for summary judgment brought by the plaintiff, an international freight forwarder, against the defendant, an international importer and exporter of commercial goods for resale. In January 2007, the defendant contacted the plaintiff to arrange the carriage of perishable goods from Germany to Kingston, Jamaica. The destination was later changed to St. Lucia and in March 2007 …

Full Summary

Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Co. v. Moosonee Trans. Ltd., 2009 QCCQ 7569

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

This was a subrogated claim for several vehicles and other cargo lost when a barge sank en route to James Bay. The defendants were a company that arranged the transportation and the actual carrier. A preliminary issue in the case was whether the claim was governed by Canadian maritime law or the Civil Code of Quebec. The Court had little …

Full Summary

H. Paulin & Co. Ltd. v. A Plus Freight Forwarder Co. Ltd., 2009 FC 727

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

The issue in this case was whether the receiver of cargo under “freight Pre-paid” bills of lading was liable for non-payment of freight. The parties were: H. Paulin, the receiver/consignee; A Plus, a local forwarder who issued bills of lading and was held to be a NVOCC; Scanwell, a forwarder who had contracted with A Plus and who issued “freight …

Full Summary

Timberwest Forest Corp. v. Pacific Link Ocean Services Corporation, 2009 FCA 119

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

This was a subrogated claim for the loss of approximately C$1 million worth of logs. The logs were lost from the deck of a barge while en route from Vancouver to California. The issues in the case were: first, whether the cargo was sufficiently described as deck cargo to remove it from the application of the Hague-Visby Rules (thus denying …

Full Summary

Hapag-Lloyd Container Line GmbH v. Moo Transport & Commodities Inc., 2009 FC 201

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

The issue in this case was whether a counterclaim for damage to cargo and non-delivery should be dismissed on the grounds that the counterclaim was made out of time. The moving party relied upon a clause in the bill of lading that stipulated the carrier would be discharged from all liability unless suit was brought within one year (almost identical …

Full Summary

Rio Tinto Shipping (Asia) Pte Ltd. v. Korea Line Corporation, 2008 FC 1376

In Carriage of Goods by Sea on (Updated )

In this matter the applicant, a voyage charterer, applied to pay into court the freight which it admitted was owing. The reason was that there were conflicting claims by two parities as to entitlement to the freight. The Court recognized the conundrum of the applicant and allowed it to pay the freight into court in satisfaction of its liability in …

Full Summary